National Journal.com

nationaljournal.com > Lost in Transition

Government Executive Home NationalJournal.com

National Journal's Lost in Transition

Tuesday, November 18, 2008 11:11 AM

Senate Judiciary Committee Postpones Counterterrorism Subpoena

By SHANE HARRIS

Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., on Monday evening took a serious bargaining chip off the table in the committee's ongoing efforts to reveal secret Bush administration terrorism policies.

The committee has "postponed the return date" of a subpoena for Justice Department legal opinions that undergird the Bush administration's most controversial counterterrorism policies, including interrogation, detention and surveillance. The subpoena had been served on Attorney General Michael Mukasey and commanded him to "provide the legal advice issued by the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel" regarding those policies, Leahy's office said in a statement.

But now, it's not clear when those documents will be turned over. What's changed?

A committee staff member said on background, "This a committee-authorized and committee-issued subpoena. It's committee business. It's a subpoena to the current administration, and was issued before the election."

The postponement removes a significant check on the executive branch. Leahy said in a statement, "We still don't know the full scope of these ill-advised policies." But as for President-elect Barack Obama and his new team, Leahy said, "I am fully confident that the remaining OLC documents will be reviewed under the new administration."

No deadline, no demand. Even though the committee has not rescinded the subpoena, it's unclear what leverage lawmakers now have over the incoming administration, or whether they intend to force the release of the OLC documents at all.

As National Journal reported recently, the OLC documents in question are classified opinions that the Obama administration is presumably reviewing very carefully.

The full text of the committee statement follows after the jump.

WASHINGTON (Monday, Nov. 17, 2008) -- Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) Monday postponed the return date of a Committee-issued subpoena for documents from the Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel. The subpoena, which was served on Attorney General Michael Mukasey, commanded the Attorney General to provide the legal advice issued by the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) concerning the administration's national security policies related to terrorism.

In a letter sent to Leahy dated November 14, the Department of Justice indicated that six unredacted, unclassified documents related to the Committee subpoena would be provided to Committee members on November 17 and other documents would be made available for review.

"I appreciate the efforts of the Justice Department to respond to this subpoena, and was pleased to learn of their intention to provide materials not previously made available to us. This is a good start," said Leahy. "I will work in the coming days with the Justice Department to ensure that the Committee receives access to these promised documents, and I am fully confident that the remaining OLC documents will be reviewed under the new administration."

"Under the Bush-Cheney administration, the Office of Legal Counsel secretly misconstrued laws passed by Congress. By writing secret law, OLC has given this administration a legal 'free pass' for its misguided policies, including its policies concerning interrogation and torture. The advice we have seen has been deeply flawed, sloppy, and wrong. Today, we still don't know the full scope of these ill-advised policies."

For more than five years, Leahy and other members of the Senate Judiciary Committee have sought OLC documents concerning the Bush administration's terrorism policies, including its detainee and interrogation practices. In an August letter to White House Counsel Fred Fielding, Leahy and Committee Ranking Member Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) again requested a comprehensive index of legal memorandum, letters and opinions from the Office of Legal Counsel. In September, the Judiciary Committee authorized Leahy to issue subpoenas for OLC's legal advice relating to the administration's national security policies.

The November 14 letter [PDF] from the Justice Department indicated that the Committee would receive the following documents on Monday:

  • March 18, 2004 memorandum regarding "Protected persons' in Occupied Iraq" (subpoena item 1.A)
  • November 6, 2001 memorandum entitled "Re: Legality of the Use of Military Commissions to Try Terrorists" (subpoena item 1.H)
  • February 7, 2002 memorandum entitled "Status of Taliban Forces Under Article 4 of the Third Geneva Convention of 1949"
  • October 23, 2002 memorandum entitled "Authority of President Under Domestic and International Law to Use Military Force Against Iraq"
  • November 8, 2002 memorandum entitled "Effect of a Recent United Nation's Security Counsel Resolution on the Authority of the President Under International Law to Use Military Force Against Iraq"
  • December 7, 2002 memorandum entitled "Further Material Breach Under U.N. Security Counsel Resolution 1141 as a Result of False Statements or Omissions in Iraq's WMD Declaration"

The Justice Department also indicated on November 14 that additional documents would be made available for Committee review, including:

  • October 23, 2001 memorandum regarding "Authority for Use of Force to Combat Terrorist Activities Within the United States" (subpoena item 1.C)
  • June 27, 2002 memorandum regarding the "Applicability of 18 U.S.C. 4001 (a) to Military Detention of United States Citizens" (subpoena item 1.D)

8 Responses

 

Responded on January 10, 2012 1:36 AM

iPhone App Development

There was much such gaiety in the time of Bush administration. Nevertheless the member said this a committee-authorized and committee-issued subpoena. It's committee business. It's a subpoena to the current administration, and was issued before the election. So, we have to wait up to the election. iPhone App Development

Responded on September 21, 2011 4:30 AM

jimmy

 produced utilizing the same actually are about better-than-average level of top quality. The feel is a superb one, like the certain handcrafts together with specifics. Your complete handbag seems up-market. Substances put to make use of for any High quality A louis vuitton replica Incorporates: sound garments, gadgets utilizing leading coating artificial leather in whose color choice will never alteration ultimately, components of fine outstanding

Responded on May 8, 2011 9:26 PM

Christian Louboutin Alta A Talon Python Short Boots

I decided a little while ago to do what I can to make sure that what little privacy I have left is completely in my control. There are ways to protect one's privacy, of course. But is it possible that if we all become "un-privacized," we'll simply be in a different paradigm with new and interesting expectations of privacy? The strange will become the new.

 

Christian Louboutin Alta A Talon Python Short Boots

Responded on May 3, 2011 6:00 AM

abercrombie sale

Those like abercrombie and fitch, American Eagle, Hollister, Von Dutch, Juicy Couture and a number of other fashionable American brands that could normally only be bought on a trip to the states can now be found on the web

Responded on April 11, 2011 3:47 AM

auto scanner

it's good to see this information in your post, i was looking the same but there was not any proper resource, than now i have the link which i was looking for my research.
auto scanner

Responded on April 8, 2011 3:42 AM

ed hardy

For some reason, teams that design these jackets think they need their logo and colors super bold, possibly converting us to their team. ed hardy Go for something more subtle and understated, with low key prints, colors subdued or only wear it to the game.

Responded on November 29, 2010 3:28 AM

pandora bracelets

Now that oil prices have plummeted, I also think we may have more leverage with Russia than we did before.pandora bracelets uk

Responded on November 23, 2010 6:02 AM

gucci wallet


it's good to see this information in your post, i was looking the same but there was not any proper resource, than now i have the link which i was looking for my research.
|gucci wallet

Comments


To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words. By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although Lost in Transition does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.

Advertisement
Get Print-friendly version of this page E-mail this page to a friend Subscribe to Lost in Transition Follow us on Twitter
Advertisement

Search Blog Entries

Archives

Special Reports

Categories

News

Resources

Blogs

Tech Daily Dose

Can't We All Get Along?

February 09, 2012 7:13 am

Experts

Experts: Education

Act Responsibly Or Else

Latest response:Paul CombeFebruary 09, 2012 10:01 am
Experts: Transportation

Now We're Getting Political

Latest response:Ken OrskiFebruary 09, 2012 11:02 am